New York Supreme Court, 1909

Heilperin v. Levy

Heilperin v. Levy
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 19, 1909 · Erlanger
116 N.Y.S. 676 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. A. Seidman, for plaintiff., Arnstein & Levy, for defendant.

Heilperin v. Levy

Opinion of the Court

ERLANGER, J.

Particulars of the defense of payment cannot be ordered. Barone v. O’Leary, 44 App. Div. 418, 60 N. Y. Supp. 1131. As to the other matters, the allegations are merely in effect denials of plaintiff’s allegations of ownership of the bond and mortgage referred to in the complaint. Particulars will not be ordered when the answer is merely a refutation of plaintiff’s assertions, nor will a party be required to disclose his evidence. Smith v. Anderson, 126 App. Div. 24, 110 N. Y. Supp. 191. In a proper case, a copy of an instrument will be ordered to be given; but this is not such a case.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.