Marquardt v. Clement
Opinion of the Court
The conviction of the plaintiff for' violating the Liquor Tax Law did not of itself work a forfeiture of the new certificate under which he was trafficking on the date of the judgment of conviction under section 36, subdivision 2, of the law.
That section provides that, upon conviction, the person convicted shall be guilty of a misdemeanor “ and shall forfeit the liquor tax certificate and be deprived of all rights and privileges thereunder." At the time the plaintiff violated the law, he was not the holder of a certificate; he was a bartender employed by his father. Forfeiture ipso facto of the certificate referred to in section 36, subdivision 2, refers to the certificate under which the traffic is conducted at the time of the violation.
The plaintiff started in- business for himself at the sanie store some months after the violation which occurred while
Judgment for plaintiff; but the injunction shall not be construed as preventing proper and legal proceedings to obtain a revocation of said license.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.