New York Supreme Court, 1910

Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York

Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1910
68 Misc. 347

Counsel

Archibald R. Watson (Theodore Connoly and Charles McIntyre, of counsel), for appellant., Nathan B. Chadsey, for respondent.

Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The attorneys for the respective parties herein, after issue was joined by the filing of verified pleadings, signed a stipulation embodying a so-called statement of facts ” and submitted the case thus made to the court below* for decision, and from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff the defendant appeals.

The court below was wholly without jurisdiction to render judgment under such circumstances. Section 241 of the Municipal Court Act provides for a submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts; but such statement must be accompanied by an affidavit of one or more of the parties showing that such controversy is a real one, and no such affidavit is furnished in the case at bar. Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627; Weinstein v. Douglas, 51 id. 559; Neustaedter v. Weiner, 108 N. Y. Supp. 650.

Present: Seabury, Guv and Bijur, JJ.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and new trial ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.