In re Ricker
Opinion of the Court
Application for an order for the appointment of the Central Trust Company of New York as committee of the property within the state of an incompetent, adjudged- so without the state. The petitioner is now the committee of the person and the property appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction in the state of Massachusetts. Section 2326 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that she may be appointed the committee in this jurisdiction notwithstanding the fact that she is a nonresident. However, she is unwilling to assume that responsibility. The Central Trust Company is not unwilling to accept the appointment, but it has doubt as to the court’s power under section 2326 to appoint any one other than the foreign committee, and, further, as to whether the appointment of another person or corporation must proceed under section 2327 under the direction of the court by an inquisition before a jury. I do not think that the objections raised are all sufficient. The power of the court over property belonging to incompetents within its jurisdiction is broad and inherent. The owner of the property in this proceeding has been judicially declared an incompetent. This is conclusively established by an exemplified copy of a judicial record of a court of proper jurisdiction. This record and the decree which it proves are entitled to .full faith and credit in every state of the United States. Matter of Curtiss, 134 App. Div. 551; Matter of Neally, 26 How. Pr. 402. The status of the incompetent'being estab
Application granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.