Terryberry v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.
Opinion of the Court
This is an action for personal injuries. Defendant pleads, inter alia, a release. Plaintiff replies, by order of the court, that no release was executed by him as such. Defendant moves, under Code Civ. Proc. § 973, for a trial of said issue separately, prior to any trial of the other issues in the case.
The practice of granting orders for separate trials in such cases has been upheld as constitutional by the Court of Appeals. Smith v. Western Pacific R. Co., 144 App. Div. 180, 128 N. Y. Supp. 966, affirmed 203 N. Y. 499, 96 N. E. 1106, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 137, Ann. Cas. 1913B, 264. Orders denying motions for separate trials have been reversed in the First and Second departments, although the Code section says “the court in its discretion” may make such orders. Pemberton v. McAdoo, 149 App. Div. 20, 133 N. Y. Supp. 627; Warner v. Star Co., 162 App. Div. 458, 147 N. Y. Supp. 803. In the case last cited, as in this, the issue was the validity of a release of claim for personal injuries.
Under Code Civ. Proc. § 768, let the motion stand over until April 10th. Defendant may pay $10 and serve affidavits on or before April 3d. Answering affidavits, if any, to be served on or before April 7, 1915.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.