New York Supreme Court, 1925

Bernfeld v. Freedenberg

Bernfeld v. Freedenberg
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1925 · Hagarty
125 Misc. 645; 211 N.Y.S. 692; 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1007

Counsel

J. B. Boudin, for the plaintiffs., Wilber, Norman & Kahn, for the defendant.

Bernfeld v. Freedenberg

Opinion of the Court

Hagarty, J.:

Prior to December 30,1924, the parties to this action, in copartnership, conducted a store at No. 554 Fifth avenue, which is the second store from the southwest corner of Fifteenth street. Upon the date mentioned the partnership was dissolved and the defendant sold his interest to the plaintiffs and agreed not to engage in a similar business within a radius of five (5) square blocks from the location ” of the store sold during a designated period. Thereafter, and on the 3d day of January, 1925, a bill of sale was delivered, which contained the same covenant except that the word measured ” was inserted after the word blocks.” The defendant has since opened a store for the transaction of the same line of business at No. 652 Fifth avenue, which is on the southwest corner of Nineteenth street and Fifth. avenue. In other words, the defendant is in the fifth square block north of the square block in which the plaintiffs’ store is located. Defendant submits proof that he is beyond the “ measured ” distance of a quarter of a mile; that twenty city blocks constitute a mile, and, therefore, he is more than five blocks away, measured from plaintiffs’ store. The agreement, however, was made with reference to the existing physical conditions. The intention was that the defendant should *646not engage in a similar line of business within the limits of any square block, i. e., the territory defined by streets surrounding it, distant less than five from any part of the square block in which the plaintiffs’ store is located. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Undertaking, $1,500.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.