New York Supreme Court, 1925

Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line

Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 3, 1925 · Wagner
126 Misc. 7; 211 N.Y.S. 736; 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1024

Counsel

Neil P. Cullom, for the plaintiff., Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Fearey, for the defendant.

Abt-Bernot, Inc. v. Holland-American Line

Opinion of the Court

Wagner, J.

The defense set up in paragraph 8 of the answer is insufficient because it is hypothetical, and because it is a plea in the alternative, and because it fails to set forth the ultimate facts upon which defendant relies to be relieved of liability.

The plea of confession and avoidance requires a definite admission and a statement of ultimate facts which, if established, exonerate the defendant of liability.

The motion to strike out paragraph 8 is granted, with leave to defendant to serve an amended answer within twenty days.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.