Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1927

Kartinganer v. Cohn

Kartinganer v. Cohn
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 30, 1927
129 Misc. 910; 223 N.Y.S. 465; 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 966

Counsel

Samuel Horowitz, for the appellants., Maxwell E. Lopin, for the respondent.

Kartinganer v. Cohn

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The retention of the check, marked “ in full,” for an unreasonable length of time will be deemed an acceptance of the condition on which the payment was made. (Patten v. Lynett, 133 App. Div. 746.)

• Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bum?, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.