New York Supreme Court, 1927

Meyer v. Meyer

Meyer v. Meyer
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 14, 1927 · Franicenthaler
130 Misc. 719; 224 N.Y.S. 337; 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1111

Counsel

Wellman, Smyth & Scofield, for the plaintiff, opposed., Hughes, Rounds, Schurman & Dwight, for the defendant, for the motion.

Meyer v. Meyer

Opinion of the Court

Franicenthaler, J.

Motion to dismiss complaint is granted, without costs, with leave to serve an amended complaint within ten days. The complaint should affirmatively allege facts showing that plaintiff is legally entitled, under the National Prohibition Act; to the possession of the liquor for the detention of which this action is brought. (Lundy v. Orr, 205 App. Div. 296; Lennox v. Meehan, 121 Misc. 678, 680; Nat. Prohibition Act [41 U. S. Stat. at Large, 317, § 33; U. S. Code, tit. 27, § 50]; Gonch v. Republic Storage Co., Inc., 245 N. Y. 272.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.