New York Supreme Court, 1927

Dreyer v. Shapiro

Dreyer v. Shapiro
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 18, 1927 · Cropsey
143 Misc. 170; 255 N.Y.S. 602; 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1322

Counsel

Eisenberg & Eisenberg, for the plaintiff., Nadal, Jones & Mowton [Kenneth V. Fisher of counsel], for the defendant Sarah Gelberg., Benjamin C. Loder, for the defendant Rose Shapiro.

Dreyer v. Shapiro

Opinion of the Court

Cropsey, J.

Motion granted. When the action was started the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1474) provided in effect that costs could be recovered if plaintiff obtained an award of $500 or more. Before the trial the statute was amended to provide in effect that no costs would be recoverable unless the award was $2,000 or more.

The amendment did not except pending actions. It, therefore, applies to all actions and speaks as of the time when judgment may be entered. That is the rule in this State. (15 C. J. 23, 24; Supervisors of Onondaga v. Briggs, 3 Den. 173; Munson v. Curtis, 43 Hun, 214, 216; Erie County v. Fridenberg, 161 N. Y. Supp. 401.)

As plaintiff recovered less than $2,000, he is not entitled to costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.