New York Supreme Court, 1928

Van Ness v. Van Ness

Van Ness v. Van Ness
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 13, 1928 · Frankenthaler
131 Misc. 587; 227 N.Y.S. 469; 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 745

Counsel

McManus, Ernst & Ernst, for the plaintiff., John G. Snyder, for the defendant.

Van Ness v. Van Ness

Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, J.

The action is brought by plaintiff against the defendant, her former husband, to recover alimony accrued and unpaid under a judgment of divorce obtained by plaintiff in New Jersey, and to sequester the defendant’s property. The answer contains a counterclaim alleging that plaintiff wrongfully withholds chattels belonging to the defendant and asks judgment for the counterclaim for the ■ possession of the chattels or for damages in the event that possession cannot be given. The counterclaim finds no justification in the provisions of either subdivision of section 286 of the Civil Practice Act. It does not arise out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of the plaintiff’s claim and it is not connected with the subject of the action. Subdivision 1 is, therefore, inapplicable. Subdivision 2 applies only to a counterclaim sounding in contract ” and, therefore, does not avail the defendant. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim is accordingly granted. Order signed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.