New York Supreme Court, 1929

Luddington v. Millard

Luddington v. Millard
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 30, 1929 · Rodenbeck
135 Misc. 480; 238 N.Y.S. 238; 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1018

Counsel

Howard F. Barnes [James S. Bryan of counsel], for the plaintiff., Everett K. Van Allen, for the defendant The Rochester Mortgage Corporation.

Luddington v. Millard

Opinion of the Court

Rodenbeck, J.

It does not appear from the answer that the alleged agreement was oral, and the objection of the Statute of Frauds is not available at this time. (Oldham v. Pinkus, 31 Misc. 768.) The agreement does not seek to modify a written contract but to establish an independent collateral agreement. (McCreery v. Day, 119 N. Y. 1.) The motion being one to strike out the answer containing denials, is in the nature of a demurrer and the allegations in the answer must be accepted as true.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs to abide event.

So ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.