F. H. Hecht & Co. v. Felenga
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff moves to vacate notice of examination before trial of plaintiff corporation by or through L. Earl Bretz, treasurer of plaintiff corporation. Defendant’s first counterclaim seeks recovery of an alleged balance due as compensation for his services as employee or agent of plaintiff, measured by salary, commissions, and possibly by a share of plaintiff’s business profits. Defendant’s second counterclaim seeks damages resulting from an alleged wrongful discharge. Plaintiff’s opposition is mainly that this action is in equity, and prior to an examination of this character defendant must first establish his right to an accounting. The character of an action is determined from the facts alleged and not from the relief demanded. (Jones v. Gould, No. 2, 123 App. Div. 236; Shalek v. Jetter Brewing Co., 155 N. Y. Supp. 972; Bradbury’s Rules of Pleading, vol. 1, p. 321.) In New York it is established that an agent or employee who sells on commission or under an agreement that his compensation shall be measured by a percentage of the profits has an adequate remedy at law and cannot sue in equity and is entitled to prove his case by an examination of his employer before trial and is also entitled to a discovery and inspection of his employer’s books and records. (Hathaway v. Clendening Co., 135 App. Div. 407; Oppenheimer v. Van Raalte, 151 id. 601; Guince v. Murphy, Inc,., 223 id. 337.)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.