New York Supreme Court, 1932

Seidman & Sons, Inc. v. Tilrose Camp Operating Co.

Seidman & Sons, Inc. v. Tilrose Camp Operating Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 8, 1932 · Humphrey
153 Misc. 510; 274 N.Y.S. 606; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1803

Counsel

Tobias A. Peppier, for the plaintiff., Pettit & Pettit, for the defendants.

Seidman & Sons, Inc. v. Tilrose Camp Operating Co.

Opinion of the Court

Humphrey, J.

This action is brought for an injunction restraining the defendants from operating, and permitting to be operated, an open-air parking space for more than five cars, in a restricted district.

The plaintiff is the owner of a licensed garage diagonally across the street from the premises of the defendants, and its business is curtailed and its finances impaired by defendants’ operation.

The plaintiff is such an interested party as entitles it to prosecute this action. (Rice v. Van Vranken, 255 N. Y. 541.) The provisions of article 2, section 4, subdivisions 15 and 29 of the Amended Building Zone Resolution are applicable to defendants’ situation.

The plaintiff may have judgment enjoining the defendants from the operation of their premises as an open-air parking space.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.