New York Supreme Court, 1934

In re People

In re People
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 20, 1934 · Frankenthaler
153 Misc. 536; 275 N.Y.S. 275; 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1783

Counsel

Leon London, for the petitioner, for the motion., Isidore Witkind, for the owner, opposed., Harry Rodwin [Henry Spitz, Irving H. Jurow and Joseph Lapidus of counsel], for the rehabilitator, respondent, opposed.

In re People

Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, J.

The petitioner’s mortgage is in arrears only with respect to an installment of principal. It appears, however, that the failure to pay an installment of principal does not constitute a default upon the guaranty until eighteen months after payment shall be demanded in writing by the assured, provided such demand be made after said principal sum shall have become due under the terms of the said bond and mortgage.” (Italics the court’s.) It follows that the respondent is not in default under its guaranty. The claim that the funds in the hands of the respondent should be employed to pay arrears in principal instead of interest and taxes appears to be without merit under the circumstances here disclosed. The motion to terminate the agency and for other relief is accordingly denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.