New York Supreme Court, 1938

Wehle Electric Co. v. Kallock

Wehle Electric Co. v. Kallock
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 16, 1938 · Personius
167 Misc. 598; 4 N.Y.S.2d 544; 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1598

Counsel

Lloyd C. Anderson [N. W. Hankin of counsel], for the plaintiff., Engelman & Rosenberg, for the Belson Manufacturing Company.

Wehle Electric Co. v. Kallock

Opinion of the Court

Personius, J.

Since rendering decision herein on March 31, 1938 (167 Mise. 596), it has been called to the court’s attention for the first time that on August 6, 1937, an order was made at a Special Term of this court held in Broome county, directing that the lien of the Belson Manufacturing Company against William Kallock be, nunc pro tunc, continued for one year from February 13, 1937.

We rejected the lien of said defendant on the ground that it had not been renewed within one year, as required by the statute. This lien having been continued, nunc pro tunc, by an order not appealed from, set aside or modified, it should be and hereby is allowed. Our former decision is modified accordingly. (Manton v. Brooklyn & Flatbush Realty Co., 217 N. Y. 284; Dick Sand Co. v. State of New York, 137 Misc. 622, 625.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.