Thiot Realty Corp. v. Rosen
Thiot Realty Corp. v. Rosen
176 Misc. 109; 27 N.Y.S.2d 803; 1941 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1804
Opinion of the Court
Mere silence on the part of the landlord after receipt of a letter stating that tenant wished to remain as a monthly tenant was not sufficient to establish that a month-to-month tenancy agreement was created. Something more than mere silence is
. Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff as claimed in the summons.
All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and McLaughlin, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.