New York Supreme Court, 1942

In re Brown

In re Brown
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 8, 1942 · McLaughlin
179 Misc. 221; 39 N.Y.S.2d 244

Counsel

William W. Lowell for petitioner., David Diamond and J. Irving Weissman for respondent.

In re Brown

Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, J.

Section 793 of the Civil Practice Act provides that where the judgment debtor claims or is proved to be rendering services to or employed by another without salary or compensation, or at such inadequate salary or compensation as to satisfy the court that the same is merely colorable and designed to. defraud or impede creditors of the debtor, the court may direct the debtor to make payments on account of the judgment in installments based upon the reasonable value of the services rendered by the judgment debtor or upon his then earning ability. It is clear from the papers before the court on the present motion that the judgment debtor renders services as “ Pastor of various incorporated organizations. He claims that he receives no compensation whatsoever for these services. The situation is therefore one within the express wording of-section 793 of the Civil Practice Act. The judgment debtor since the enactment of that section may not render services gratis at the expense of his creditors. The motion is granted to the extent of directing the judgment debtor to pay the sum of $100 per week on account of the judgment. Settle order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.