New York Supreme Court, 1942

City Service Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. Vanzo

City Service Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. Vanzo
New York Supreme Court · Decided December 28, 1942 · Bernstein
179 Misc. 368; 39 N.Y.S.2d 24; 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2286

Counsel

Irving E. Epstein for petitioner., Sheehan & Harold for respondent.

City Service Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. Vanzo

Opinion of the Court

Bernstein, J.

Motion for an order directing an arbitration of alleged disputes and staying the respondent from proceeding with his action in the Municipal Court of the City of New York is denied. The action in the Municipal Court has been brought under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), and cannot be restrained by reason of a contract compelling arbitration. Arbitration is a remedial right, while the right of suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act is a substantive right. (Voutrey v. General Baking Co., 39 F. Supp. 974; Matter of Berkovitz v. Arbib & Houlberg, Inc., 230 N. Y. 261.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.