New York Supreme Court, 1943

Hines v. LaGuardia

Hines v. LaGuardia
New York Supreme Court · Decided March 17, 1943 · Miller
179 Misc. 1036; 44 N.Y.S.2d 69; 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2386

Counsel

Robert J. Eager for petitioner., Thomas D. Thacher, Corporation Counsel (Jeremiah M. Evarts of counsel), for respondents.

Hines v. LaGuardia

Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.

On November 9, 1942, the date of the petitioner’s application for retirement, he was not in the city service (see Matter of Welling v. Marsh, 179 Misc. 1033, decided simultaneously herewith, in a proceeding to which petitioner became a party by stipulation). Petitioner had resigned on September 3, 1942, and had not been validly reappointed until December 14, 1942. It follows that petitioner’s application for a retirement allowance must be denied. Section B3-36.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, upon which petitioner relies, requires that the application for the retirement allowance be made by a “ member in city service. ” Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.