Rienzo v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.
Opinion of the Court
This is a motion to strike affirmative defenses and a counterclaim in an action brought to recover compensa
In the second defense and counterclaim the defendants allege that the collective bargaining agreements “ were entered into and carried out in the mutual and bona fide belief that the plaintiffs, as building service employees at said premises were not engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Act and that therefore said Act had no application to their employment relationship. ’ ’
It is not claimed that the agreements fail to express that which the parties had agreed upon or that it is not the agreement they intended to make. The fact that, when the agreements were made, the parties were ignorant of the applicability of the Fair Labor Standards Act to the elevator operators in loft buildings, does not justify reformation (Curtis v. Albee, 167 N. Y. 360, 364; Bailey v. Karolyna Company, Ltd., 50 F. Supp. 142). The second defense and counterclaim is insufficient. As the third defense has been withdrawn,' it is accordingly stricken out. The motion is granted in all respects.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.