Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1945

Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences, Inc.

Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences, Inc.
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 20, 1945
184 Misc. 186; 54 N.Y.S.2d 117; 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1657

Counsel

Alfred S. Julien and Theodore Kamens for plaintiff-appellant and respondent., Mordecai Goldberg and Irving Segal for defendant-appellant., William E. Lyons for defendant-respondent.

Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s proofs do not fully sustain her alleged cause of action.

On appeal by defendant Windsor Besidences, Inc., the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to said appellant to abide the event.

Appeal from the order should be dismissed.

On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.*

Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

See, also, Rufo v. South Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 268 App. Div. 1057, and cf. McCabe v. Cohen, 268 App. Div. 1064.— [Rep.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.