New York Supreme Court, 1945

39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner

39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 5, 1945
184 Misc. 598; 54 N.Y.S.2d 745; 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1759

Counsel

Milton Leonard for appellant., Jacob R. Seller for respondent.

39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The uncontradicted evidence established that the tenant was in the wholesale and not retail business. The occupancy, therefore, is within the provisions of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1944, ch. 3).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of the tenant.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.