39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner
39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner
184 Misc. 598; 54 N.Y.S.2d 745; 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1759
Opinion of the Court
The uncontradicted evidence established that the tenant was in the wholesale and not retail business. The occupancy, therefore, is within the provisions of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1944, ch. 3).
The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of the tenant.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.