New York Supreme Court, 1945

In re O'Connor

In re O'Connor
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 27, 1945 · Wenzel
185 Misc. 650; 57 N.Y.S.2d 276; 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2217

Counsel

Robert C. Roy for Thomas J. O’Connor, petitioner* for the motion., Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Isidore Siegel of counsel), opposed.

In re O'Connor

Opinion of the Court

Wenzel, J.

The petitioner, uncle of the incompetent war veteran, moves for an order permitting the substituted committee of the incompetent to pay him the sum of $15 per week from the incompetent’s estate, for his support and maintenance.

There is no legal obligation upon the part of the incompetent to support" the petitioner and under the Federal statutes the petitioner, as the incompetent’s uncle, is not defined as;'a dependent [World War Adjusted Compensation" Act, § 607.; U. S. Code, tit. 38, § 667]. Application denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.