New York Supreme Court, 1947

King v. Liotti

King v. Liotti
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 1, 1947 · Kadien
190 Misc. 672; 76 N.Y.S.2d 98; 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3541

Counsel

Charles Margett for plaintiffs., James F. Hart for defendants.

King v. Liotti

Opinion of the Court

Kadien, J.

Motion to examine the defendants before trial granted as prayed for with the exception that all language following the word defendants on the sixth line of item “ 2 ” will be deleted. The claim of privilege against self-incriminatian is no ground for denying a motion for the examination of *673a party before trial. The right to refuse to incriminate oneself is a personal right which must be claimed at the time when the questions are asked. (Heit & Weisenthal, Inc., v. Licht, 218 App. Div. 753.) This privilege may be claimed at the examination before trial as in the ca^e of an examination at the trial. (Yomato Trading Co. v. Brown, 27 Hun 248; Matter of Siegel v. Crawford, 266 App. Div. 878, affd. 292 N. Y. 651.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.