New York Supreme Court, 1948

President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Albert

President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Albert
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 21, 1948
193 Misc. 64; 84 N.Y.S.2d 795; 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3673

Counsel

Lloyd B. Kanter for appellant., Benjamin Harwood, Jr., for respondents.

President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Albert

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is nothing in the Business Bent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.) which prohibits a landlord from terminating a monthly tenancy by a proper notice. Here there was lawful notice terminating the letting. The prohibition of the statute is against removal if the tenant pays the rent to which the landlord is entitled. The provisions of section 5, when read- with the provisions of section 8 dealing with renewals, make clear that the emergency rent is fair rent which the landlord can ask in the absence of a subsisting agreement for a lower rent.

The final order should be unanimously modified on the law, by directing that the landlord recover the amount demanded in the petition, and as so modified, final order affirmed,, with $12.50 costs to the landlord.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.