New York Supreme Court, 1949

Auerbach v. Taub

Auerbach v. Taub
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 5, 1949 · Cohalan
194 Misc. 86; 87 N.Y.S.2d 902; 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2025

Counsel

Louis Rivkin for defendants., Jay Leo Rothschild for plaintiff.

Auerbach v. Taub

Opinion of the Court

Cohalan, J.

Motion to strike the second and third causes is denied. Three separate causes are stated seeking a recovery *87on a contract of employment. Plaintiff’s counsel has chosen to anticipate defenses which may be raised and to avoid them in the complaint. It appears that such pleading is permissible (1 Abbott’s Forms of Pleading [3d ed.], n. 45, p. 223 et seq., and cases there cited).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.