New York Supreme Court, 1951

Jacobson Bros. Exquisite Footwear, Inc. v. Relda Fine Shoes, Inc.

Jacobson Bros. Exquisite Footwear, Inc. v. Relda Fine Shoes, Inc.
New York Supreme Court · Decided June 13, 1951 · Eder
199 Misc. 820; 105 N.Y.S.2d 520; 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1935

Counsel

Spence, Hotchkiss, Parker & Duryea for plaintiff., Shapiro & Sikawitt for defendant.

Jacobson Bros. Exquisite Footwear, Inc. v. Relda Fine Shoes, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Eder, J.

On settlement of decision and judgment. The action herein was brought pursuant to section 369-a et seq. of the General Business Law (Feld-Crawford Fair Trade Act), which relates to intrastate commerce. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp. (341 U. S. 384) is clearly distinguishable. It is clear therefrom that it is without application or governing effect here. That case involved the Miller-Tydings Enabling Act (U. S. Code, tit. 15, § 1), and relates to interstate commerce. This action at bar involves intrastate transactions. The Schwegmann case ruling is applicable to and affects only interstate transactions in an action by a producer against a local retailer. In the instant case both parties were local retailers and the transactions were entirely local. Moreover, there is no evidence in the record that interstate commerce was involved; neither “ implication ” nor “ inference may be invoked in that regard. The court sees no ground for reconsideration of its decision because of the ruling in the Schwegmann case.

Decision and judgment signed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.