New York Supreme Court, 1952

Sholgen v. Lipsett, Inc.

Sholgen v. Lipsett, Inc.
New York Supreme Court · Decided September 9, 1952 · Schwartz
14 Misc. 2d 296; 116 N.Y.S.2d 165; 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1530

Counsel

Lawrence I. Hammer for petitioner., Manning, Harnisch, Hollinger, Quinnan $ Shea for Lipsett, Inc., respondent., Michael F. Pinto for Union, respondent.

Sholgen v. Lipsett, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Arthur H. Schwartz, J.

A member of a union which has signed a collective agreement with an employer brings this proceeding to compel arbitration under that agreement. Petitioner, as an employee, is not a party to that agreement. Under the *297arbitration terms thereof, only the union has the right to demand arbitration and not any individual members of the union who may have a grievance. To permit individual employees to invoke the arbitration machinery of a collective agreement would disrupt the proper operation of such procedures. The motion is therefore denied. Since the union has submitted an affidavit to the effect that it has no objection to a determination of petitioner’s grievance by arbitration, this motion is denied without prejudice to a demand for arbitration by the union.

Settle order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.