Chirichella v. Shamrock Cab Corp.
Opinion of the Court
The automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger was in collision with a taxicab. As a result she sustained personal injuries for which she brought suit to recover damages against both Shamrock Cab Corp., the owner of the taxicab, and Excellent Blouse Co., Inc., the owner of the automobile in which she was a passenger. The latter, pursuant to section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act, impleaded the plaintiff’s husband, who operated the automobile at the time of the accident and was both an officer and stockholder of its corporate owner.
At the trial of this action all parties stipulated for the court to decide all questions of fact and law with respect to the third-party complaint. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor against both defendants in the sum of $7,500.
The third-party defendant now claims that the third-party complaint should be dismissed against him, since Excellent Blouse Co., Inc., the owner of the automobile, and he, its operator, were joint tort-feasors. With this contention the court does not agree. Since the verdict of the jury imports a finding of negligence on the part of the operators of both automobiles involved in the collision, it follows that the registered owners of
Accordingly, the defendant Excellent Blouse Co., Inc., as third-party plaintiff, is entitled to have judgment-over against the third-party defendant for the amount of the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff which said third-party plaintiff is called upon to and does pay. The parties are granted thirty days ’ stay of execution and sixty days in which to make and file a case on appeal.
Proceed accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.