New York Supreme Court, 1957

Templeton v. Adar Co.

Templeton v. Adar Co.
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 1957 · Saypol
9 Misc. 2d 226; 172 N.Y.S.2d 939; 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2156

Counsel

Myles, Wormser £ Koch for plaintiff., Moses H. Koenig for defendant.

Templeton v. Adar Co.

Opinion of the Court

Irving H. Saypol, J.

This motion to vacate the notice to examine the plaintiff’s assignor (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288) must be granted since the proceeding to examine by notice (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a) extends only to party, agent or employee (Shahmoon v. Shahmoon, N. Y. L. J., April 18, 1956, p. 15, col. 4). This is not indicative of any conclusion on the merits but solely to avoid a moot order (Manley v. Stuart Silver Co., 203 Misc. 218).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.