Claim of Tripodi v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
In his petition for leave to serve a notice of claim against the City of New York for injuries sus
It appears further than on March 17, 1959 letters testamentary of the estate of the deceased were issued to the petitioner. The petitioner has served or will serve a notice of claim for the wrongful death. This would appear to be a matter of right since the time to do so does not commence until the appointment of the administrator (Buduson v. Curtis, 285 App. Div. 517, affd. 309 N. Y. 879). Petitioner by the instant proceeding seeks leave of the court to file a notice of claim for the personal injuries and conscious pain and suffering of the decedent, which, pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, must be filed within 90 days after the claim arises. This has been held to mean that the period begins to run from the date of the injury which, in this instance, was April 23,1958 (Joseph v. McVeigh, 285 App. Div. 386, motion for leave to appeal granted 285 App. Div. 941). However, as provided for by subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, “ Where the claimant is an infant * * * and by reason of such disability fails to serve a notice of claim as provided * * * the court, in its discretion, may grant leave to serve a notice of claim within a reasonable time after the expiration of the time specified ’ ’.
Petitioner cogently points out that since the infant was not born until August 8, 1958, the notice could not possibly have been served before then. Moreover, it would appear that some of the pain and suffering of the infant did not occur until the operation in November. In any event, it is obvious that the disability of infancy prevented the infant from filing the notice of claim timely.
Accordingly, the motion is granted. Submit order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.