New York Supreme Court, 1959

Hamburger v. New York State Thruway Authority

Hamburger v. New York State Thruway Authority
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 23, 1959 · Supple
18 Misc. 2d 202; 189 N.Y.S.2d 339; 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3249

Counsel

Gordon Miller for plaintiff., Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (Arthur W. Mattson, Douglas L. Manley and Grace K. Banoff of counsel), for defendant.

Hamburger v. New York State Thruway Authority

Opinion of the Court

Leonard J. Supple, J.

The motion of the defendant to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the action will be denied.

The motion of the plaintiff for an injunction during the pendency of the action will be denied because

(1) the plaintiff has not made the clear and convincing case necessary on any application for an injunction pendente lite, and particularly where, as here, he seeks to restrain a public authority from the performance of a public service involving the safety and exposure to danger of the public; and

(2) the acts allegedly performed by the defendant constituted the performance of service required by the contract to be performed by plaintiff and on which he was defaulting; and

(3) the plaintiff has made no showing of irreparable damage or that he lost any substantial custom because defendant performed the service it did; and

(4) the papers indicate that plaintiff has not fully performed and is not fully performing under the contract.

Submit orders on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.