Pergola v. Nicastro
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs, passengers in defendant’s vehicle, move for summary judgment in this action to recover damages for personal injuries. In support of the motion plaintiffs refer to the statement of defendant, set forth in his report to the Motor Vehicle Bureau as to the manner in which the accident occurred, as follows: ‘ ‘ While driving west on Gropsey Ave. a child, about 15 ft. in front of me, started to cross the street. I became panicky, lost control of car, hit my gas pedal instead of brake and ran into a light pole, located in middle of Gropsey Ave.” In opposition to the motion, defendant in his affidavit states that he was proceeding in the second lane from the northerly curbline of Gropsey Avenue and:
“ Just as the front of my car passed the intersection of Bay 49th Street and Gropsey Avenue, I noted a small boy emerging from my right. When I first saw the boy he was but 15 feet to the front and right of my car. In order to avoid the accident with the boy I immediately swerved my oar sharply to the left.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.