New York Supreme Court, 1963

Sanchez v. City of New York

Sanchez v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 7, 1963 · Davidson
40 Misc. 2d 181; 242 N.Y.S.2d 674; 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1731

Counsel

David Schack for plaintiff. Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (George P. Eennessy of counsel), for defendant.

Sanchez v. City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Irwin D. Davidson, J.

Motion originally referred to Hon. Irving H. Saypol is recalled. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the ex parte order of Justice Saypol which required security for costs be deposited by a nonresident plaintiff is denied. Plaintiff submits an affidavit that he is now a resident of New York. Section 1522 of the Civil Practice Act provides for security for costs where plaintiff, when the action was commenced, was a person residing without the State. The fact that subsequent to the commencement of the action plaintiff becomes a resident of the State does not entitle him to have the order vacated (Mieteika v. Minderman, 118 Misc. 555; Neuman v. New York City Tr. Auth., N. Y. L. J., April 2, 1959, p. 13, col. 7; 23 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 278, p. 321). Plaintiff’s motion is in all respects denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.