Jenks v. Murphy
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff sued the defendants for money damages for personal injuries which he alleges he sustained. In his pleadings, he based his claim against each defendant on negligence and breach of warranty. The trial was held at the January 1964: Term of Supreme Court, Orleans County, As to each defendant, the jury returned a verdict of no cause of action. Following the entry of the judgments in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal.
The plaintiff made a motion at a motion term of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for an order granting him leave to appeal on typewritten papers, and for a further order determining the procedure to follow for the payment for a transcript of the trial minutes. The plaintiff’s application was granted to the extent of permitting the appeal to be prosecuted upon one original typewritten record on appeal and five typewritten briefs. In its order, the court stated that the application for the furnishing to the plaintiff without charge of a copy of the stenographer’s minutes must be made in the first instance to the court before whom the action was tried.
The plaintiff has now applied to this court for an order pursuant to CPLR 1102 (subd. [b]) directing the furnishing to him without charge a copy of the stenographer’s minutes of the trial.
In the motion now before this court, the plaintiff has not asked permission to proceed as a poor person. In his notice of motion he has asked for an order pursuant to CPLE 1102 (subd. [b]) which will direct the furnishing to the plaintiff as appellant in his pending appeal, without charge, a copy of the stenographer’s minutes. The relief asked for is one of the privileges of a poor person. However, before the plaintiff can enjoy the privileges of a poor person, he first must make an application to proceed as a poor person, and the court must then rule on such application.
Due to the fact that the plaintiff did not proceed upon the trial as a poor person, but has now indicated through his attorney upon the oral argument of the motion before this court that he wishes to prosecute his appeal as a poor person, he should apply for permission to prosecute the appeal as a poor person to the Appellate Division where the appeal is now pending (Siegelbaum v. Bowling, 279 N. Y. 22).
Until the Appellate Division grants his application to prosecute his appeal as a poor person, this court cannot make an order pursuant to CPLE 1102 (subd. [b]) directing the furnishing to the plaintiff without charge a copy of the stenographer’s
The application for relief in this court, as set forth in the notice of motion is denied, without prejudice to renew.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.