People v. North
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in an action to recover the amount of $305.50 unemployment insurance benefits paid to the defendant to which he was allegedly not legally entitled. Defendant also moves for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to section 626 of the Labor Law and CPLB 3211.
It appears that the Industrial Commissioner made a determination that the sum above set forth was received by the defendant by willful misrepresentation while he was ineligible, in that he was not totally unemployed, and, in the alternative, that he was not available for work while engaged in certain other work. Defendant contends that he was not afforded his administrative remedies of appeal from the determination and, therefore, such determination is not final on the issue of eligibility for benefits. In support of his contention defendant states that after receipt of the Commissioner’s notice of determination he applied for a hearing as provided in subdivision 1 of section 620 of the Labor Law, but was not advised of the date of such hearing; that he learned from other unidentified sources that hearings had been scheduled in his area and upon inquiring at the local unemployment insurance office he was advised as to the date of the hearing; that he appeared for a hearing on that date, which date is not stated, found no one in attendance to conduct the hearing, and was thereafter advised that a hearing had been held at which he did not appear. It.is noted
Defendant’s motion for dismissal is denied, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.