Rinaldo v. Stone
Opinion of the Court
Petitioners McCann and Rinaldo have moved for the award of attorneys’ fees under 42 USC § 1988 as the prevailing parties on a Federal constitutional claim (see, 71 NY2d 164). Central to these proceedings are the former provisions of the Nassau County Administrative Code (hereinafter referred to as NCAC) pertaining to real estate tax enforcement procedures.
Petitioner Helen McCann lost to respondent Stone her 30-year residence worth approximately $175,000 for a tax debt of $864.50. In the case of Rinaldo, a home worth more than $90,000 was acquired by respondent Stone because of unpaid taxes of $463.92. Under the then tax collection enforcement provisions of the NCAC, each year the Nassau County Treasurer compiled a list of property for which taxes had not been paid for the previous year. Those taxes became a tax lien against each property. A date was then set for the sale of those tax liens. A list of the liens and a notification to property owners that they would be sold unless outstanding charges were paid by a certain date had to be published three times in newspapers of general circulation. The only provision in the code for notice to the property owner of the tax lien sale was by such publication. There was no provision for actual notice. If no payment was made by the specified date, the liens were sold by public auction to the bidder who would accept the lowest rate of interest on the outstanding balance. Respondent Stone acquired her interest in each property upon application to the Treasurer for a deed of conveyance (NCAC § 5-51.0). Alternatively, respondent Stone could have commenced a foreclosure proceeding to obtain title.
Each petitioner homeowner instituted a CPLR article 78 proceeding contending that they had been denied due process because: they had not received actual notice of the tax lien sales; had been denied any hearing before conveyance of the property; and, because the notice they did receive was inadequate to inform them of the situation. Both matters reached the Court of Appeals (71 NY2d 164, supra) which decided that the failure to provide petitioners with actual notice of the tax lien sales deprived them of due process of law. In its decision the Court of Appeals cited Mennonite Bd. of Missions v Adams (462 US 791), a 1983 decision by the Supreme Court which held that a county’s use of these indirect forms of notice (by
The claims against respondent John V. Scaduto, as Treasurer of Nassau County, have been resolved by settlement. Respondent Stone argues that she should not be held responsible under section 1988 for attorneys’ fees because she was simply a private tax lien purchaser who was neither a State actor nor a person acting under color of State law. However her actions subsequent to the tax sale in requesting and obtaining a treasurer’s deed from the county based upon constitutionally inadequate notice do constitute acting "under color of State law” as that phrase has been construed in Lugar v Edmondson Oil Co. (457 US 922 [1982]).
Stone could have, but did not, file a foreclosure action in court, as provided by NCAC § 5-58.0 et seq. Having chosen to obtain the deeds through the Treasurer’s extrajudicial assistance, her affirmative action was taken "under color of law”.
It is the contention of respondent Stone that petitioners are not entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees from her under 42 USC § 1988 due to the existence of "special circumstances”. In support of this contention she claims that she played "no part in the alleged constitutional violation and was powerless to prevent whatever violation may have been caused by Nassau County’s Administrative Code”. However, that contention is belied by the fact that the instant litigation was prompted by
This court’s decision in the case of Rinaldo v Stone (index No. 26001/83, Feb. 27, 1984) gave her notice that any deed subsequently requested
Motions by petitioners McCann and Rinaldo for an order pursuant to 42 USC §§ 1983 and 1988 directing respondent Stone to pay attorneys’ fees and expenses are granted.
That portion of the compensatory fee attributable to respondent Stone, within the parameters of a "lodestar” calculation of hours expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, the court determines to be in the amount of $20,000.
. Respondent Stone requested a deed of conveyance to Mrs. McCann’s property from the Treasurer on June 26, 1984.
. She had affirmatively argued that the code provisions were not deficient if, despite the absence of a requirement of notice by mail, such notice was in fact given by the Nassau County Treasurer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.