Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Supreme Court, 1994

Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 5, 1994
160 Misc. 2d 592; 613 N.Y.S.2d 523; 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 240

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Barry Siskin, New York City, for appellant. Evans, Orr, Pacelli, Norton & Laffan, P. C., New York City, for respondent.

Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed with $10 costs.

*593There are issues of fact which require a trial. We note that plaintiff has exclusive knowledge of the key facts while Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation’s liability is predicated on the actions of an unknown owner and operator of a hit-and-run vehicle and it must rely in large part on cross-examination of plaintiff at trial.

Scholnick, J. P., Aronin and Chetta, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.