Curtis v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals
Curtis v. Jones, 4 How. Pr. 182 (N.Y. 1847)

Curtis v. Jones

Opinion of the Court

This was an *183action of replevin, in the detinet, in which the defendant avowed the detention of the property as a mechanic having a lien thereon for the manufacturing. And the question arose on demurrer, as to the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s plea in bar, setting up a special agreement between them in answer to said avowry. (Reported 3 Denio, 590.)

Reference

Full Case Name
Abijah B. Curtis, in error v. Justus B. Jones, in error
Status
Published