Peck v. . Sherwood
Cases that cite this one
38 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- McDonald v. Hoffman (Mont. 1958)
- Chamberlin v. . Gleason (N.Y. 1900)
- Stevens v. . Melcher (N.Y. 1897)
- Estate of Koch (New York Surrogate's Court 1890)
- De Witt v. Cooper (New York Supreme Court 1879)
- In re the Estate of Friedrichs (New York Surrogate's Court 1965)
- In re the Estate of Sobel (New York Surrogate's Court 1940)
- In re the Estate of Juilliard (New York Surrogate's Court 1938)
- In re the Estate of Phelps (New York Surrogate's Court 1937)
- In re the Estate of Cronise (New York Surrogate's Court 1937)
- In re the Estate of Bommer (New York Surrogate's Court 1936)
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Bush (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1935)
- In re the Estate of Williams (New York Surrogate's Court 1933)
- In re McClelland (New York Surrogate's Court 1929)
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Schulz (New York Surrogate's Court 1928)
- Peerless Candy Co. v. Kessler (New York Supreme Court 1924)
- In re Catfish River Drainage District (Wis. 1922)
- Kirchner v. Kirchner (New York Supreme Court 1911)
- Troy v. Protestant Episcopal Church (Ala. 1911)
- Conkie v. Grisson (New York Supreme Court 1898)
- Huston v. Tribbetts (Ill. 1898)
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Young (New York Surrogate's Court 1896)
- In re Cornell's Estate (New York Surrogate's Court 1896)
- Tribbetts v. Huston (Ill. App. Ct. 1896)
- Addis v. Addis (New York Supreme Court 1891)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 617 FOLGER, J., reads for modifying decree of surrogate so as to direct that the sum of $750 left in the hands of the surrogate be held by him to pay any amount which he is bound to pay on the James Coyle note and interest, and a proper portion of the sum paid for premiums for insurance and cost of lightning-rods and interest, as well as the share of the assessment for flagging and interest; and, in all other things, that decree of surrogate be affirmed.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.