Cone v. . Niagara Fire Insurance Company
Cases that cite this one
40 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Berry v. American Central Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1890)
- Philipp Bros. v. Bradley Express, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1973)
- Farmers' Union Mutual Protective Ass'n v. San Luis State Bank (Colo. 1929)
- Lewis v. Guardian Fire & Life Assurance Co. of London, England (N.Y. 1905)
- Brown v. Commercial Fire Insurance (D.C. Cir. 1903)
- Wood v. American Fire Insurance Co. of Philadelphia (New York Supreme Court 1894)
- Van Schoick v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co. (N.Y. 1877)
- Schlesinger v. PG Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- McCoy v. Continental Insurance (Mich. 1949)
- Perkins v. Century Insurance v. British General Insurance (Mich. 1942)
- Brogoitti v. Walter (Ariz. 1934)
- In re the Estate of Huselton (New York Surrogate's Court 1929)
- Modern Music Shop, Inc. v. Concordia Fire Insurance (New York City Court 1927)
- Farmers & Merchants' Bank v. Hartford Fire Insurance (Idaho 1926)
- Commercial Credit Co. v. Eisenhour (Ariz. 1925)
- Batts v. . Sullivan (N.C. 1921)
- Ampersand Hotel Co. v. Home Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1909)
- Ebensburg Building & Loan Ass'n v. Westchester Fire Insurance (Pa. Super. Ct. 1905)
- Key ex rel. Heaton v. Continental Insurance (Mo. Ct. App. 1903)
- Boyd v. Boyd (New York Supreme Court 1899)
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Keating (Md. 1897)
- Wood v. . American Fire Ins. Co. (N.Y. 1896)
- Palmer Savings Bank v. Insurance Co. of North America (Mass. 1896)
- Donaldson v. Insurance Co. (Tenn. 1895)
- Phenix Insurance v. Omaha Loan & Trust Co. (Neb. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 621
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 622
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 623
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 624
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 625 FOLGER, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur; except RAPALLO, J., not voting; MILLER, J., not sitting, and GROVER, J., who concurs in result.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.