Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

New York Court of Appeals
Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 70 N.Y. 220 (N.Y. 1877)
1877 N.Y. LEXIS 612
<italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Bailway Co. is a domestic and not a foreign corporation, and hence that chap. 165, S. L. of 1842, has no application to this case, but to the transfer agents of such corporations. Being subject to the duties and obligations of the laws relating to domestic corporations, it comes within the provisions of the Bevised Statutes, vol. 1, Edm. ed., 558, which contains special provisions in regard to the *223 books containing the names of stockholders and authorizes an examination of the same within thirty days previous to any election of directors, etc.

We concur with the opinion of the General Term, that this statute does not deprive the stockholder of a corporation of the right to examine its transfer books for proper purposes and on proper occasions at other times, and a proceeding by mandamus may be invoked for the purpose of enforcing such right. But the exercise of the power of the court in granting a mandamus is discretionary, and when the General Term has held that such discretion has been properly exercised in refusing the writ, we are not at liberty to interfere with their decision. It has repeatedly been held in kindred cases by this court, that no appeal lies from such an order of the General Term, and such being the fact, and as the relator had no statutory rights to the writ, the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

All concur, except Rapallo, J., taking no part.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Application of Russell Sage Et Al., Appellants, v. the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company and Others, Respondents
Cited By
19 cases
Status
Published