Gelpcke v. . Quentell

New York Court of Appeals June 4, 1878

Gelpcke v. . Quentell, 74 N.Y. 599 (N.Y. 1878)

1878 N.Y. LEXIS 785

Rapallo, Earl

Opinion of the Court

Rapallo, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

Andrews and Miller, JJ., concur.

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 601

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 602 RAPALLO, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

ANDREWS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

EARL, J., concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.

CHURCH, Ch. J., and FOLGER, J., dissent.

Judgment reversed.

Concurring Opinion

Earl, J.,

concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.

Church, Ch. J., and Folger, J., dissent.

Judgment reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name: Herman Gelpcke Et Al., Appellants, v. William E. Quentell, Respondent
Cited By: 6 cases
Status: Published