New York Court of Appeals, 1878

Gelpcke v. . Quentell

New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 4, 1878 · Rapallo, Earl

74 N.Y. 599; 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 785

Opinion of the Court

Rapallo, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

Andrews and Miller, JJ., concur.

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 601

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 602 RAPALLO, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

ANDREWS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

EARL, J., concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.

CHURCH, Ch. J., and FOLGER, J., dissent.

Judgment reversed.

Concurring Opinion

Earl, J.,

concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.

Church, Ch. J., and Folger, J., dissent.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.