New York Court of Appeals, 1879

Stanton v. . King

Stanton v. . King
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 21, 1879 · Folger
76 N.Y. 585; 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 544

Counsel

Philip S. Crook for appellant. James C. Hays for respondent.

Stanton v. . King

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Folger, J.,

reads for modification by inserting before the words “ striking out,” the words “ so far as,” and by striking out the word “ dismissed,” and inserting in lieu thereof this phrase, viz.: “ striclcen out;” and by striking out the words “ and from entering” mid inserting in lieu thereof, the words “so as to enter;” and by reducing the amount of costs allowed to twenty dollars, for making motion in Special Term, and for one appeal to General Term. And as modified, order affirmed, without costs to either party against the other in this court.

. All concur, except Rapallo, who is for reversal of order so far as it stays proceedings in this action, and Andreavs, J., absent at argument.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.