Pelton v. . Westchester Fire Insurance Company
Cases that cite this one
26 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Cook v. Citizens Insurance Co. (W. Va. 1928)
- Meade v. North Country Co-Operative Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1985)
- Ope Shipping, Ltd. v. Allstate Insurance (2d Cir. 1982)
- Van Curler Development Corp. v. City of Schenectady (New York Supreme Court 1969)
- Citizens' Ins. Co. v. Bailey (8th Cir. 1928)
- Moore v. Taylor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1916)
- Phoenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. Quinette (Okla. 1912)
- Point Gratiot Sand v. Hartford Fire Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1912)
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co. (Colo. 1911)
- In re Clement (New York Supreme Court 1908)
- Finkbohner v. Glens Falls Insurance (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
- Brighton Beach Racing Ass'n v. Home Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1906)
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Erickson (Fla. 1905)
- Brighton Beach Racing Ass'n v. Home Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1905)
- Phenix Ins. v. Kerr (8th Cir. 1904)
- Beckrich v. . City of North Tonawanda (N.Y. 1902)
- Sloan v. . Baird (N.Y. 1900)
- Alamo Fire Insurance Co. v. Lancaster (Tex. App. 1894)
- Ladd v. Aetna Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1893)
- Mott v. Citizens' Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1893)
- American Artistic Gold Stamping Co. v. Glens Falls Ins (New York Court of Common Pleas 1892)
- Smith v. Phenix Insurance (Cal. 1890)
- Goldman v. Rosenberg (N.Y. 1889)
- Johannes v. Standard Fire Office of London (Wis. 1887)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 607
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 608
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 609 DANFORTH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.