De Meli v. . De Meli
De Meli v. . De Meli
90 N.Y. 654; 1882 N.Y. LEXIS 459
De Meli v. . De Meli
Opinion of the Court
reads for affirmance. Andrews, Oh. J., Dan-forth and Tracy, JJ., concur on the ground that under the statute in question (Code §§ 438, 439, 1763) a, prima, facie case was made to authorize the order for the publication of the summons. Finch, J., concurs in result; Earl, J., dissents; Rapadlo, J., absent.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.