Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1885

Hurst v. . New York Produce Exchange

Hurst v. . New York Produce Exchange
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 6, 1885 · Earl
3 N.E. 42; 100 N.Y. 605; 55 Sickels 605; 1885 N.Y. LEXIS 1020 (North Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Benjamin H. Bristow for appellants. John Chetwood for respondent.

Hurst v. . New York Produce Exchange

Opinion of the Court

Earl, J.,

reads for reversal of order and dissolution of temporary injunction; Ruger, Ch. J., and Miller, J., concur; Andrews, J. concurs in result (on ground above stated).

Danforth, J. (dissenting), reads for affirmance; Rapallo and Finch, JJ., concur.

Order reversed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.