New York Court of Appeals, 1887

Sherry v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 18, 1887

10 N.E. 128; 104 N.Y. 652; 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 643 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

McPeak v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad (New York Supreme Court 1895)
Getman v. . Delaware, L. W.R.R. Co. (N.Y. 1900)
Getman v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad (N.Y. 1900)
Chapman v. New York Cent. & H. R. Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1899)
Davis v. Kallfelz (New York County Courts 1898)
Schulz v. Second Avenue Railway Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1896)
Wilbur v. Delaware, L. & W. Railroad (New York Supreme Court 1895)
Pitts v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad (New York Supreme Court 1894)
Beckwith v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. (New York Supreme Court 1889)
Woodard v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad (N.Y. 1887)
Woodard v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad (N.Y. 1887)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 654

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 655

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 656

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 657 DANFORTH, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.